01 · Scope the job
Apparel sourcing is a chain of decisions—not a supplier search box.
Sourcing begins before contacting a factory and continues after a purchase order. The buyer must define the product, decide what evidence matters, compare offers on the same assumptions, control samples and approvals, monitor production decisions, confirm quality requirements and prepare for destination-market obligations.
A sourcing agent, trading company, manufacturer and managed supplier network may own different parts of that chain. The useful question is not simply “Are you a factory?” It is: which legal and operating entity owns each decision, which work is performed where, and what evidence reaches the buyer?
It explains how a buyer can structure a China sourcing review. The separate commercial coordination page explains how to evaluate a potential working model. Neither page should publish unsupported factory, capacity, timing or customer claims.
02 · Before supplier outreach
Build one buyer brief that every candidate receives.
A quotation is comparable only when the candidates are pricing the same product, service scope and commercial assumptions. Mark unknowns instead of filling them with guesses.
Product definition
- Product type, intended use and target customer.
- Current tech pack, reference sample or specification status.
- Size range, colourways and style/SKU structure.
- Target materials, trims, artwork, labels and packaging.
Development state
- Which decisions are approved, provisional or still open.
- Which sample is needed and what that round must prove.
- Who owns comments, revisions and final approval.
- Whether physical references can be shared safely.
Commercial context
- Estimated quantity by style, colour and size—not only a total.
- Destination market and target delivery window.
- Required Incoterm, currency and quote-validity expectation.
- Services that must be included or shown separately.
Quality and compliance
- Approved references and measurable quality criteria.
- Required testing, labelling and documentation by destination.
- Inspection, evidence and nonconformity decision expectations.
- Product-specific safety, material or restricted-substance questions.
03 · Supplier model
Screen the operating model before asking for the lowest quote.
Two candidates can use the same service label while offering very different ownership. Ask who contracts with the buyer, who develops the product, who procures materials, where production occurs, who inspects, who can approve a change and who is accountable when the plan moves.
- Entity and contracting role
- Record the legal name, business role, invoice entity and relationship to any disclosed production site. A polished website name is not a legal identity.
- Product and process fit
- Ask for evidence relevant to the intended construction, material and finish. Do not generalize from an unrelated category.
- In-house and external work
- Identify which development, production, decoration, finishing, testing and inspection tasks are performed by whom.
- Decision ownership
- Name the person or function responsible for specifications, approvals, supplier communication, production status, quality evidence and escalation.
- Information flow
- Confirm the reporting format, update rhythm, version owner and the route for urgent deviations.
04 · Evidence review
Verify the claim at the level where the risk exists.
A document or image is useful only when its entity, site, scope, date and relationship to the proposed project are clear. A business licence can help verify an entity; it does not prove category capability. A certificate may cover one site or process; it does not automatically cover every supplier, product or date.
The OECD garment and footwear guidance treats due diligence as an ongoing risk-based process across operations, supply chains and business relationships—not a one-time collection of certificates.[1]
- Ask what exact claim the evidence supports.
- Check the named entity, issuing body, scope, location, validity and date.
- Confirm whether the material may be shared and whether redactions affect interpretation.
- Separate supplier-provided evidence from independently verifiable records.
- Record what remains unknown and the decision that cannot be made yet.
05 · Quotation comparison
Normalize the assumptions before comparing the number.
A lower unit price may exclude development, tests, labels, packaging, inspection, freight or material assumptions included elsewhere. Build a comparison sheet that forces every candidate to answer the same fields and flags any line that is “included,” “excluded,” “allowance,” “buyer supplied,” or “to be confirmed.”
- Product basis
- Specification version, material composition or allowance, colourways, size range, construction and finish.
- Quantity basis
- Quantity by style/colour/size, minimums or surcharges, tolerance and whether the price depends on a combined program.
- Service scope
- Pattern, sample rounds, sourcing, tests, inspection, labels, packaging, documentation and any third-party cost.
- Commercial basis
- Currency, payment milestones, quote validity, Incoterm, tooling or setup, freight responsibility and tax/duty exclusions.
- Timing basis
- What starts the clock, what remains open, material dependency, approval dependency and which date is estimate rather than commitment.
If a material, quantity or approval is unknown, request a clearly labelled assumption or range. A precise number built on hidden assumptions is less useful than a conditional quote.
06 · Samples and approvals
Every sample round needs one declared decision purpose.
Before a sample begins, write down what it is meant to prove: interpretation, fit, material/colour, construction, finish, size set, pre-production readiness or another defined decision. The review should identify the reference version, comments, severity, owner and next required action.
- Issue the current inputs. Date the specification, artwork, bill of materials and physical reference.
- Name the decision. State which questions the sample can and cannot resolve.
- Review against explicit criteria. Separate measurements, construction, material, appearance, labels and packaging.
- Consolidate comments. One approved comment set prevents conflicting instructions.
- Close the round. Record approved, approved with condition, revise, reject or awaiting information.
Use the detailed sample-approval framework when the development sequence itself is the main risk.
07 · Production visibility
Agree on decisions and evidence—not a stream of vague updates.
A useful production view connects each milestone with its prerequisite, owner, evidence and exception route. “In production” says little about material status, approval state, line readiness, quality findings or the effect of an open change.
- Identify the production reference and record all approved deviations.
- Define which milestones need evidence and which events require buyer approval.
- Separate planned date, latest estimate, actual completion and blocker.
- Record issues with affected quantity/scope, containment, cause review, proposed disposition and owner.
- Confirm which records must survive for repeat-order review.
08 · Quality control
Move quality questions into the brief and approval record.
Quality should cover product definition, materials and trims, construction, measurements, appearance, labelling, packaging and the rules for handling nonconformity. Inspection cannot resolve a requirement that was never defined or an approved reference that cannot be identified.
Use the garment quality-control checklist to prepare the criteria and release record. The checklist is buyer guidance; it does not claim a specific HACOLD inspection plan, AQL, laboratory or certification.
09 · Destination market
Import and labelling requirements belong upstream.
The importer remains responsible for destination-market obligations even when a supplier helps prepare information. Australian Border Force provides the official entry point for import requirements and declarations.[2] UK government guidance requires textile businesses to address fibre-content labelling, while its Trade Tariff service uses product details such as materials, production and packaging in classification work.[3][4]
Before approving labels or production, confirm the destination, importer of record, product classification, origin basis, fibre composition, care information, product-specific safety requirements, documentation and professional adviser/broker ownership. Rules can change; recheck the applicable official source for the shipment and market.
10 · Decision gate
End the review with an explicit next decision.
The sourcing review should finish with one of four states—not an ambiguous “looks good.”
- Proceed: the evidence and commercial assumptions are sufficient for the defined next step.
- Proceed with conditions: named gaps must close before a later commitment.
- Hold: a material question cannot yet be answered or compared.
- Reject: the operating model, evidence or risk is not suitable for this project.
When the task changes from learning the process to evaluating a coordination relationship, continue to apparel sourcing and manufacturing. When enough project context is known, prepare the structured RFQ.